All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Perform Enterprise Analysis |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
259257 | Perform Enterprise Analysis | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Computer Sciences and Information Systems | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences | Information Technology and Computer Sciences | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will enable learners to perform enterprise analysis to meet strategic business needs and goals.
A learner credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify business needs, opportunities and requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The internal and external business environment and architecture are analysed within the scope of a designated business mandate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The current state of technology is assessed in order to inform solution architecture and clarify business problems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Technology includes infrastructure and applications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The business problem, opportunities and/or needs are analysed in order to identify requirements for new solutions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Analyse includes investigate, describe and evaluate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A gap analysis is performed to determine where the organisation is and where it wants to be. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Gap analysis includes but is not limited to the use of one of more of the following techniques, benchmark analysis, competitive analysis, problem analysis, SWOT analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Initial requirements are derived and documented in order to clarify solution scope. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Determine an approach to identifying the most appropriate solution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The potential solution approach options are identified in order to prepare for a feasibility analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Solution approach includes but is not limited to a description of the nature of the solution, resourcing and acquisition options, in-house or outsourcing choices, package selection or new development. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A feasibility analysis is conducted for each solution approach option to facilitate business decision making processes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Viable potential solution approach is recommended to facilitate business decision making processes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A feasibility study report is produced to communicate and validate the recommended solution approach with stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Feasibility study includes but is not limited to cost analysis, risk analysis, benefit analysis, technical feasibility, operational feasibility and cultural feasibility. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Define the project and solution scope. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The scope of work is defined using selected techniques in accordance with project standards in order to prepare the business case. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Techniques include but not limited to work break down structures, project scope document, Gantt chart. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The ambit of investigation is defined using selected techniques in accordance with project standards in order to prepare the business case. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Techniques include but not limited to decomposition diagrams, architecture diagrams, organisation charts, stakeholder analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The solution scope is explored in order to prepare the business case. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The scope of work is established using selected techniques in order to prepare and present the business case. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Techniques include but not limited to work break down structures, project scope document, Gantt chart. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The solution and project scope are clarified by listing exclusions. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Develop the business case. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The benefits are identified and quantified for project justification purposes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Costs are identified and quantified for project justification and control purposes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
An initial risks assessment is conducted for project feasibility purposes and to inform a risk management plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A business case is compiled and presented in order to facilitate project selection and decision making by business stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A business case includes but is not limited to project objectives, business needs, problem analysis, requirements list, stakeholder analysis, expected business benefits, project and solution scope, time, cost and resources estimates, cost benefit analysis, identified risks, feasibility and recommendation. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively through:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science, technology and indigenous knowledge effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others through:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 63909 | National Certificate: Business Analysis | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MICTS |
Elective | 79886 | National Certificate: Business Advising | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SERVICES |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Atvance Institute (Pty) Ltd |
2. | BEE Clinic Pty Ltd |
3. | Clean Heat Academy |
4. | DC Academy (PTY)LTD |
5. | Epitome Villa (Pty)Ltd |
6. | EYETHU NATIONAL COMPUTER COLLEGE PTY LTD |
7. | FACULTY TRAINING INSTITUTE PTY LTD |
8. | Finweb Business Consultancy |
9. | HAVOHEJ CONSULTANCY |
10. | HILLCROSS BUSINESS SCHOOL (PTY |
11. | IT Academy |
12. | K Boneng Consulting Services P |
13. | Metanoia Ratings PTY LTD |
14. | Mpande Technologies cc |
15. | Mufuka Business and Technical |
16. | On the Ball College Pty ltd |
17. | OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT |
18. | Polokwane Technology Institute (Pty) Ltd |
19. | QUALITATIVE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS |
20. | Sisekelo Sustainability Institute |
21. | SUPREME ICT CONSULTANTS |
22. | Terry Computer Services cc |
23. | The Finishing College (Pty) Lt |
24. | VUTHLARI MARKETING CONSULTING |
25. | Woosh Consultants (Pty) Ltd |
26. | YITRO INNOVATIONS |
27. | ZA WIT (PTY) LTD |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |